Offshore wind energy has been a remarkable success story in the Dutch energy transition, with the Netherlands emerging as a leader in the industry over the past decade. The government’s strategic approach, which involved auctioning large offshore wind farms and offering security to operators, reduced market risks, and ensured transparency and continuity. However, recent adjustments to regulations have seen the government shift its focus from subsidies to demanding money from wind farms, causing concerns among industry experts and companies alike.
The Dutch offshore wind journey began with subsidies for the first large parks, aimed at encouraging investments and scaling up renewable energy projects. As a result, the cost of building offshore wind farms significantly dropped over the years, reducing the need for continued financial support. The government provided grid connections and permits, while companies participated in annual auctions based on set criteria for qualitative and financial evaluation.
In a significant move, the Netherlands has increased the maximum amount companies can bid for the IJmuiden Ver Alpha & Beta wind farms by tenfold to over €33 billion for the two parks. The purpose behind this change was to avoid multiple parties bidding the maximum amount and to standardize bids. However, this shift has left the wind energy sector apprehensive.
Jan Vos, chairman of the Dutch Wind and Energy Association (NWEA), expressed concerns about this transition, stating that it appears the governments are now motivated by financial gains rather than solving the climate problem and securing energy supply. The sector has witnessed companies facing financial struggles, such as Vattenfall, which recently cancelled one of Europe’s largest offshore wind farms in the UK due to a 40% increase in costs, making the project financially unviable.
The escalating costs in the wind energy sector are attributed to various factors, including increased material costs, interest rates, and the constant race to scale up turbine technology. Companies strive for larger, more efficient turbines to reduce costs and make wind farms profitable, especially without subsidies and solely reliant on market electricity prices.
The situation has also raised concerns about the potential shift of wind energy expansion to non-European manufacturers, particularly Chinese turbine manufacturers, which could lead to the European industry losing its foothold in the market.
While some believe that the Dutch system’s current approach is more intelligent than that of Germany’s, which focuses purely on financial auctions, there are worries that the Netherlands could move closer to adopting a similar model in the future. Such a shift may increase the risk of overbidding and discourage certain companies from following through after winning tenders.
Jasper Vis, managing director of SSE Renewables, holds a more optimistic view and believes the current system suits the wind energy sector’s needs by awarding a significant portion of points based on bid quality. He emphasizes the importance of integrating wind energy into the energy system and aligning with ecological goals.
Despite concerns about rising costs and the possibility of a pure financial auction, the offshore wind industry in the Netherlands remains optimistic about its future. The cancellation of Vattenfall’s wind farm is considered an isolated incident, with increased demand for wind farms until 2030 leading to growth spurts across the entire supply chain.
The Dutch offshore wind sector has undoubtedly been a success story in the energy transition. The government’s initial subsidies played a crucial role in fostering investments and reducing the cost of building offshore wind farms. However, the shift towards pure financial auctions has raised concerns over cost-effectiveness and the potential loss of European wind energy expansion. Balancing financial return with qualitative requirements will be essential to sustain the industry’s growth and secure a greener future for the Netherlands.
Journalist covering politics, economics, commodities, and more.